| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
18/12/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
30/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
RISSO, D.; CUADRO, R.; MORON, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
DIEGO FERNANDO RISSO RIET, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; WASHINGTON ROBIN CUADRO LOPEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DAVID ALEJANDRO MORON YACOEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Respuesta de un mejoramiento de campo a estrategias de fertilización fosfatada sobre un suelo de basalto. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: BERRETTA, E.; MONTOSSI, F.; BRITO, G. (Ed.). Alternativas tecnológicas para los sistemas ganaderos del basalto. Montevideo, UY: INIA, 2014. |
|
Páginas : |
p. 35-53. |
|
Serie : |
(Serie Técnica, 217) |
|
ISSN : |
1688-9266 |
|
DOI : |
http://doi.org/10.35676/INIA/ST.217 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
Este trabajo se desarrolló con el objetivo de evaluar el efecto de distintas fuentes y niveles de P en la productividad y persistencia
de un mejoramiento de campo en suelos sobre Basalto, así como en la eficiencia de las respuestas obtenidas. De esta manera
se amplía la información para una adecuada toma de decisiones sobre las posibles estrategias de manejo de un importante componente
del costo del mejoramiento, como lo es la fertilización. |
|
Palabras claves : |
BASALTO (SUELOS); FERTILIZACIÓN FOSTATADA; SIEMBRA EN COBERTURA; SOSTENIBILIDAD PRODUCTIVA; TRÉBOL BLANCO CV ZAPICÁN. |
|
Thesagro : |
CAMPO NATURAL; LEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS; MEJORA DE PASTIZALES; TRIFOLIUM REPENS; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4262/1/ST-217p35-53.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01479naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1051911
005 2019-10-30
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1688-9266
024 7 $ahttp://doi.org/10.35676/INIA/ST.217$2DOI
100 1 $aRISSO, D.
245 $aRespuesta de un mejoramiento de campo a estrategias de fertilización fosfatada sobre un suelo de basalto.
260 $c2014
300 $ap. 35-53.
490 $a(Serie Técnica, 217)
520 $aEste trabajo se desarrolló con el objetivo de evaluar el efecto de distintas fuentes y niveles de P en la productividad y persistencia de un mejoramiento de campo en suelos sobre Basalto, así como en la eficiencia de las respuestas obtenidas. De esta manera se amplía la información para una adecuada toma de decisiones sobre las posibles estrategias de manejo de un importante componente del costo del mejoramiento, como lo es la fertilización.
650 $aCAMPO NATURAL
650 $aLEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS
650 $aMEJORA DE PASTIZALES
650 $aTRIFOLIUM REPENS
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aBASALTO (SUELOS)
653 $aFERTILIZACIÓN FOSTATADA
653 $aSIEMBRA EN COBERTURA
653 $aSOSTENIBILIDAD PRODUCTIVA
653 $aTRÉBOL BLANCO CV ZAPICÁN
700 1 $aCUADRO, R.
700 1 $aMORON, A.
773 $tIn: BERRETTA, E.; MONTOSSI, F.; BRITO, G. (Ed.). Alternativas tecnológicas para los sistemas ganaderos del basalto. Montevideo, UY: INIA, 2014.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
26/10/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
28/09/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CLARIGET, J.M.; LA MANNA, A.; LUZARDO, S.; PEREZ, E.; FERNANDEZ, E.; ROIG, G.; AZNÁREZ, V.; BANCHERO, G. |
|
Afiliación : |
JUAN MANUEL CLARIGET BRIZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALEJANDRO FRANCISCO LA MANNA ALONSO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO FELIPE LUZARDO VILLAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; EDUARDO FABIAN PEREZ ARRUTTI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GONZALO ROIG, MARFRIG Group, Río Negro,Uruguay; VALENTÍN AZNÁREZ, MARFRIG Group, Río Negro, Uruguay; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Eucalyptus bark: A new source of fiber from the wood pulp industry for feeding to beef feedlot cattle. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Applied Animal Science, Volume 36, Issue 5, October 2020, Pages 592-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2020-02002 |
|
DOI : |
10.15232/aas.2020-02002 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 28 February 2020, Accepted 26 June 2020, Available online 28 September 2020. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This research was supported by the Instituto Nacional
de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay (grant numbers N-19407, 2016) and the MARFRIG Group industry. The authors wish to thank to the agricultural technicians Christian Solari and Gabriel Fernandez for their.
cooperation. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT: Objective: Our objectives were to compare the effects of feeding eucalyptus bark or eucalyptus wood chips, both by-products from the pulp industry, on voluntary feed intake, animal performance, and physiological variables of heifers finished on high-concentrate diets. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight British-breed heifers (Angus, Hereford, and their crosses) that were 22 to 24 mo of age and had an initial BW of 355 ± 8 kg were used. Four heifers were allocated to each of the 12 pens (experimental units). The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 2 treatments and 6 replications each. The 2 different fiber sources (wood chips or bark) were included in the fattening diet in the same proportion (8.9% DM basis). The rest of the ingredients in the diet were the same. The final diet was offered 3 times per day, and heifers were fed for 84 d. Results and Discussion: Fiber source (wood chips vs. bark) did not affect ADG or G:F (P > 0.10). However, DMI (P < 0.01), DP (P = 0.04), and hot carcass weight (P = 0.06) were greater in heifers fed with bark compared with those fed with wood chips. Heifers from the bark treatment spent less time (P = 0.02) chewing than heifers from the wood chips treatment. Implications and Applications: In conclusion, bark could be used as a source of fiber for finishing cattle in high-concentrate diets at the same levels as wood chips. This finding is relevant for the feedlot industry because eucalyptus bark has no industrial uses and would represent a cheaper fiber source than wood chips. MenosABSTRACT: Objective: Our objectives were to compare the effects of feeding eucalyptus bark or eucalyptus wood chips, both by-products from the pulp industry, on voluntary feed intake, animal performance, and physiological variables of heifers finished on high-concentrate diets. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight British-breed heifers (Angus, Hereford, and their crosses) that were 22 to 24 mo of age and had an initial BW of 355 ± 8 kg were used. Four heifers were allocated to each of the 12 pens (experimental units). The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 2 treatments and 6 replications each. The 2 different fiber sources (wood chips or bark) were included in the fattening diet in the same proportion (8.9% DM basis). The rest of the ingredients in the diet were the same. The final diet was offered 3 times per day, and heifers were fed for 84 d. Results and Discussion: Fiber source (wood chips vs. bark) did not affect ADG or G:F (P > 0.10). However, DMI (P < 0.01), DP (P = 0.04), and hot carcass weight (P = 0.06) were greater in heifers fed with bark compared with those fed with wood chips. Heifers from the bark treatment spent less time (P = 0.02) chewing than heifers from the wood chips treatment. Implications and Applications: In conclusion, bark could be used as a source of fiber for finishing cattle in high-concentrate diets at the same levels as wood chips. This finding is relevant for the feedlot industry because eucalyptus bark has no industrial use... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF; EUCALYPTUS; FATTENING; FEED EFFICIENCY; ROUGHAGE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02820naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1061427
005 2020-09-28
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.15232/aas.2020-02002$2DOI
100 1 $aCLARIGET, J.M.
245 $aEucalyptus bark$bA new source of fiber from the wood pulp industry for feeding to beef feedlot cattle.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 28 February 2020, Accepted 26 June 2020, Available online 28 September 2020. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This research was supported by the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay (grant numbers N-19407, 2016) and the MARFRIG Group industry. The authors wish to thank to the agricultural technicians Christian Solari and Gabriel Fernandez for their. cooperation.
520 $aABSTRACT: Objective: Our objectives were to compare the effects of feeding eucalyptus bark or eucalyptus wood chips, both by-products from the pulp industry, on voluntary feed intake, animal performance, and physiological variables of heifers finished on high-concentrate diets. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight British-breed heifers (Angus, Hereford, and their crosses) that were 22 to 24 mo of age and had an initial BW of 355 ± 8 kg were used. Four heifers were allocated to each of the 12 pens (experimental units). The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 2 treatments and 6 replications each. The 2 different fiber sources (wood chips or bark) were included in the fattening diet in the same proportion (8.9% DM basis). The rest of the ingredients in the diet were the same. The final diet was offered 3 times per day, and heifers were fed for 84 d. Results and Discussion: Fiber source (wood chips vs. bark) did not affect ADG or G:F (P > 0.10). However, DMI (P < 0.01), DP (P = 0.04), and hot carcass weight (P = 0.06) were greater in heifers fed with bark compared with those fed with wood chips. Heifers from the bark treatment spent less time (P = 0.02) chewing than heifers from the wood chips treatment. Implications and Applications: In conclusion, bark could be used as a source of fiber for finishing cattle in high-concentrate diets at the same levels as wood chips. This finding is relevant for the feedlot industry because eucalyptus bark has no industrial uses and would represent a cheaper fiber source than wood chips.
653 $aBEEF
653 $aEUCALYPTUS
653 $aFATTENING
653 $aFEED EFFICIENCY
653 $aROUGHAGE
700 1 $aLA MANNA, A.
700 1 $aLUZARDO, S.
700 1 $aPEREZ, E.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E.
700 1 $aROIG, G.
700 1 $aAZNÁREZ, V.
700 1 $aBANCHERO, G.
773 $tApplied Animal Science, Volume 36, Issue 5, October 2020, Pages 592-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2020-02002
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
